silver nitrate notesa personal log of classic black and white cinema |
|||||||||||||||
navigationcurrently watchingThe Passion of Joan of Arc (1928, Dreyer). second viewing this month, on the Norwegian-print restoration. recent updates
14 apr · published Toland piece visitors072,643 mailing listnew posts by email. two to four a year. |
Lang's Metropolis and the Lost Reel17 jun 2009
For eighty years, Metropolis existed as a film whose reputation was larger than any surviving print could sustain. Every release between 1927 and 2010 was based on the cut versions. Historians knew from production documents that roughly a quarter of the film was missing. What was missing was anyone's guess. In 2008, a museum curator in Buenos Aires opened a 16mm reduction copy of Metropolis that had been sitting in the archive of the Museo del Cine for decades. The 16mm copy had been made from an exhibition print imported to Argentina in 1928, before the American cut had propagated. It was scratched, damaged, incomplete, and long. It was the closest thing to the original cut anyone had found. The 2010 restoration, assembled from this print plus fragments from New Zealand and elsewhere, runs 148 minutes. News of the Buenos Aires find is why I am writing this now; I have not yet seen the reconstructed version, which is meant to screen at Berlin in February 2010. What you can see, in the available version, is that the cinematography of Karl Freund (1890-1969) and Günther Rittau is not what the abbreviated versions had suggested. Freund and Rittau used double exposure, mirror work, and a technique they called the Schüfftan process (named for the special-effects supervisor Eugen Schüfftan) to combine live actors with miniature sets using angled mirrors. The city of Metropolis, which we see in multiple panoramic shots, is a combination of miniature buildings photographed at low angle and live actors in the foreground, married in camera via the Schüfftan process. The technique is the great-grandfather of every optical composite used in Hollywood from 1930 to 1990.
The film's politics are complicated. Von Harbou would later join the Nazi party; Lang would leave Germany the year after Hitler became chancellor. The "mediator between head and hands must be the heart" tagline has been read both as a centrist rejection of Communist class warfare and as a naive call for social reconciliation. I think both readings are partially correct. The cinematography is not complicated. It is one of the great technical achievements of silent cinema. [ « prev: Potemkin · next: The Kid » ] » leave a comment in the guestbook
sources |
||||||||||||||
| © 2008-2026 silver nitrate notes by Hal Vesper · home · archive · about · guestbook | |||||||||||||||